Doing Business in Japan for Travel Businesses

Doing Business in Japan for Travel Agents, Tour Operators, and DMCs

A Practical Guide for 2025–2026

Japan is one of the most attractive travel markets in the world and one of the most misunderstood from a business perspective. Visitor numbers are high. Demand is resilient. The yen remains weak by historical standards. On the surface, Japan looks like an obvious expansion market for inbound operators, luxury agencies, and destination management companies.

Operationally, Japan is not difficult. Administratively and culturally, it can be. For travel agents, tour operators, and DMCs, Japan in 2025–2026 offers real opportunity, but only if the business understands licensing, consumer protection rules, payments, labour structure, tax exposure, and the way Japanese partners actually expect to work.

This article sets out how Japan really works for travel businesses, with specific figures, thresholds, and structural friction included.

Market context: record demand but tighter execution

Japan’s inbound tourism recovery has been faster and more sustained than most developed markets. Visitor numbers in 2024 exceeded 25 million, and policy targets aim to surpass the pre-pandemic peak of 31.9 million visitors by 2026. Unlike Hong Kong, Japan’s growth is not primarily mainland China-driven. Demand is diversified across North America, Europe, Southeast Asia, Australia, and a steadily recovering China segment.

But spending patterns have shifted materially. Average spend per visitor has increased, driven by a weaker yen, longer itineraries, and growth in premium FIT, cultural tourism, ski, culinary travel, and small group experiences. For DMCs and inbound operators, this favours operational depth over scale.

Japan’s government position appears to be that Tourism is a strategic economic pillar, but consumer protection, safety, and quality control take priority over speed of market entry.

Corporate setup

Foreign companies can establish operations in Japan through several structures:

• Japanese Kabushiki Kaisha (KK)

• Godo Kaisha (GK)

• Branch office

• Representative office

For travel businesses intending to contract locally, hire staff, or apply for licences, a Japanese entity is usually unavoidable.

A KK remains the gold standard for credibility, particularly when dealing with Japanese suppliers, banks, and regulators. A GK is cheaper and faster to set up and is increasingly used by foreign-owned service businesses, but some legacy suppliers still prefer KKs.

There is no statutory minimum capital, but in practice, capitalization below JPY 5 million is often viewed as weak for licensed travel businesses. Immigration, banks, and licensing authorities all look at capital as a proxy for seriousness. Representative offices cannot engage in revenue-generating activity and are unsuitable for travel agents, tour operators, or DMCs beyond market research.

Travel agency licensing is mandatory and tightly enforced

Japan’s travel industry is regulated under the Travel Agency Act, overseen by the Japan Tourism Agency (JTA) under the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (MLIT).

Any business arranging or selling travel services in Japan must be licensed, regardless of whether the clients are Japanese or foreign. This applies squarely to inbound tour operators, DMCs arranging ground services, and agencies selling Japan itineraries locally.

Licences are divided into categories, as follows:

Type 1 Travel Agency

Required for operators selling overseas travel packages to Japanese residents. This is the most onerous category and usually irrelevant for inbound-only DMCs.

Type 2 Travel Agency

Required for domestic travel and some outbound arrangements. Many inbound operators fall here depending on structure.

Type 3 Travel Agency

Common for inbound-focused operators and DMCs arranging domestic travel services within Japan.

Travel Arrangement Business (Land Operator)

A more limited category used by some DMCs arranging ground services only, but still regulated.

Licensing requirements include minimum capital thresholds, commonly JPY 3–5 million for Type 3, appointment of a Certified Travel Services Manager, office premises with exclusive use, security deposits or guarantee arrangements, and registration with an approved travel association.

Unlike Hong Kong, Japan’s system is rule-based. If you do not meet the criteria, the licence will not be issued.

Processing times typically range from 2 to 4 months, and applications are conducted in Japanese. This alone excludes many overseas operators from attempting DIY entry.

Licensing in practice: MLIT, JTA, and why “inbound only” is not a shield

As discussed above, Japan’s travel sector is regulated under the Travel Agency Act (旅行業法), administered by the Japan Tourism Agency (JTA) under the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (MLIT). In practice, Japan applies one of the strictest licensing regimes in the world for travel businesses, and inbound operators are very much within scope.

Many foreign-owned DMCs assume that arranging ground services for overseas clients does not constitute regulated activity. That assumption regularly fails once itineraries include accommodation, transport, or bundled services arranged within Japan. Most inbound operators fall under Type 3 Travel Agency registration, while some ground handlers attempt to operate as Travel Arrangement Businesses, a narrower category that still requires registration and oversight. Licensing thresholds are rule-based, not discretionary, and applications that fail to meet capital, staffing, or premises requirements are simply rejected.

Consumer protection and bonding: not optional

Japan places heavy emphasis on consumer protection, and licensed travel agencies must either deposit a security bond with a Legal Affairs Bureau or join a recognised travel association that provides guarantee coverage. These bonds exist to protect consumers in the event of insolvency or failure to perform.

For inbound operators used to lighter regimes, this is a major adjustment, as cancellation rules, contract disclosures, itinerary documentation, and advertising standards are all regulated. Enforcement is real, and reputational damage in Japan is often more severe than financial penalties.

This is one of the reasons Japanese suppliers are cautious when dealing with unlicensed foreign operators, even for inbound business.

Capital, bonding, and consumer protection: where Japan is uncompromising

As discussed, Japan places unusually heavy emphasis on consumer protection. Licensed travel agencies must either lodge a security deposit (営業保証金) with a Legal Affairs Bureau or join a recognised travel association that provides equivalent guarantee coverage. These deposits exist specifically to protect customers in the event of insolvency or non-performance.

For inbound operators used to lighter regimes, this is often the first real shock. Capitalisation below JPY 3–5 million is commonly insufficient for licensing purposes, even where there is no formal statutory minimum for the chosen entity type. Association membership fees, annual reporting, and compliance obligations add recurring cost. Japan’s system is not designed to facilitate rapid entry. It is designed to filter out undercapitalised or transient operators.

Taxation

Japan’s corporate tax system is not low-tax by global standards. Combined effective corporate tax rates typically sit around 30 percent, depending on prefecture and size. Consumption tax, Japan’s VAT equivalent, is 10 percent, with reduced rates applying to certain items.

For travel businesses, consumption tax is where complexity arises. Domestic travel services provided in Japan are generally subject to consumption tax. Inbound travel for non-residents can, in some cases, qualify for zero-rating or exemption, but conditions are strict and documentation requirements are detailed.

Japan does not operate a broad margin scheme equivalent to EU TOMS. Structuring errors around consumption tax are common among inbound operators and can materially erode margins.

Inbound travel for non-residents can qualify for zero-rating in limited circumstances, but the conditions are strict. Bundled itineraries that include accommodation, transport, or guiding services within Japan frequently fall into taxable territory unless structured carefully. Documentation requirements are detailed, and audits focus heavily on substance rather than intent. Businesses that assume “inbound equals zero-rated” often discover otherwise several years later, when back-tax, penalties, and interest are assessed.

Permanent establishment risk is also significant. Foreign travel companies selling Japan itineraries without a Japanese entity often assume they are offshore. In practice, agent relationships, marketing activity, and operational presence can create PE exposure faster than expected.

Japan’s tax authorities are process-driven and thorough.

Banking and payments

Japanese banking remains conservative. Opening a corporate bank account as a foreign-owned travel business typically requires a Japanese entity, a physical office, a resident director or representative, and a clear explanation of business flows.

Timelines of 4 to 8 weeks are common, and rejection without explanation is not unusual.

From a customer perspective, payment behaviour in Japan is changing, but slowly.

Credit cards remain dominant for international visitors. Cash usage is still higher than in Hong Kong or China, though mobile payments such as PayPay, LINE Pay, and Suica have expanded rapidly in urban areas.

For travel businesses, this means higher card processing costs, slower settlement cycles, and greater importance of reconciliation discipline.

Japan’s payments infrastructure is reliable, but not fast by regional standards.

Employment and labour structure

Japan’s labour market operates on fundamentally different assumptions from most Western or Asian markets.

Full-time employment remains the norm, and termination is difficult. Fixed-term contracts are possible, but repeated renewals can convert into permanent employment under Japanese labour law.

There is no equivalent of Hong Kong’s MPF. Instead, employers contribute to social insurance systems covering pension, health insurance, employment insurance, and workers’ compensation.

Employer costs typically add 15–20 percent on top of gross salary.

Hiring guides, coordinators, and operations staff requires careful structuring. Independent contractor models are closely scrutinised and often reclassified as employment if control is exercised.

For inbound operators, this makes scaling cautiously important. Over-hiring is expensive to unwind.

Commercial reality: high demand, low tolerance for shortcuts

Japan rewards operators who invest in quality, relationships, and compliance. Supplier relationships are long-term. Pricing is stable. Last-minute improvisation is poorly received. Documentation standards are high.

Online platforms dominate commodity segments, but there remains strong demand for curated experiences, small group travel, and specialist itineraries that large OTAs cannot deliver efficiently.

For DMCs and inbound specialists, Japan remains one of the most attractive premium markets globally. It is also one of the least forgiving of operational sloppiness.

Closing perspective

Japan in 2025–2026 is not a market for experimentation without preparation, but It is a market that rewards seriousness, patience, and structural discipline. Licensing is non-negotiable. Consumer protection is enforced. Tax exposure is real. Employment decisions carry long-term consequences.

For travel agents, tour operators, and DMCs willing to operate within that framework, Japan offers scale, stability, and sustained demand that few markets can match.

Foreign Exchange Risk in Japan: How Yen Volatility Really Affects Travel Agents and DMC Margins

Japan’s weak yen is not a short-term anomaly. It is the result of prolonged monetary divergence between Japan and other major economies, particularly the United States and Europe. While global interest rates rose sharply in 2022–2024, Japan maintained ultra-loose monetary policy far longer than peer markets, leaving the yen structurally vulnerable. For travel businesses operating in or selling Japan, this creates asymmetric FX exposure.

Inbound operators typically collect revenue in USD, EUR, GBP, or AUD, while the majority of operating costs, including hotels, transport, guides, and ground services, are denominated in JPY. On paper, this appears favorable. In practice, unmanaged FX exposure introduces margin volatility that can erase profitability.

The risk is not the level of the yen. The risk is the speed and timing of movement between booking, deposit collection, final payment, and supplier settlement.

Timing mismatches are the real FX problem

Most Japan itineraries are sold months in advance. Deposits are often collected at booking, with balances due close to departure. Supplier payments, however, frequently follow fixed domestic timelines that do not align with client payment schedules. This creates a classic FX timing mismatch.

If the yen strengthens materially between deposit receipt and supplier settlement, margins compress immediately. If the yen weakens further, operators may benefit, but only if pricing and cash flow are aligned to capture that upside.

Many inbound operators assume they are naturally hedged because revenue is foreign currency and costs are yen. In reality, without discipline around settlement timing, pricing buffers, and FX conversion points, this assumption is fragile.

Japan’s relatively stable pricing culture also limits the ability to reprice dynamically once a contract is agreed.

Hedging in Japan is conservative, but effective when used properly

Japan is not an aggressive FX market for corporates. Most local banks favor simple, conservative instruments. For travel businesses, this is usually appropriate.

Forward contracts remain the most practical hedging tool for inbound operators with predictable yen outflows. They allow operators to lock in yen costs against confirmed bookings, reducing margin volatility without introducing speculative risk.

Options are available but less commonly used by small and mid-sized operators, both due to cost and complexity. They are more relevant for larger operators with seasonal exposure or highly concentrated booking windows.

Operators who hedge successfully in Japan tend to do three things consistently:
• hedge only confirmed exposure, not forecasts
• align hedge tenors to supplier payment schedules
• document FX policy clearly for internal discipline

Unstructured hedging creates as much risk as it removes.

Pricing discipline matters more in Japan than most markets

Japanese suppliers expect to be paid in Yen, so sudden FX-driven repricing is poorly received and can damage long-term relationships. This makes internal FX buffers for travel agents/operators and disciplined pricing models essential.

Well-run operators typically build conservative FX assumptions into pricing rather than relying on spot rates at the time of sale. This reduces short-term competitiveness slightly but protects margin integrity over the full operating cycle.

For agencies selling Japan itineraries from overseas, FX should be treated as a core operational risk and not a treasury afterthought, especially with current volative rates.

Why FX mistakes in Japan are expensive

Japan is forgiving of operational errors when addressed transparently. It is far less forgiving of financial instability.

Late payments, renegotiated supplier prices due to FX losses, or inconsistent settlement behaviour damage credibility quickly. Once trust is lost, it is difficult to rebuild.

For travel agents, tour operators, and DMCs, disciplined FX management in Japan is not about optimisation. It is about survival, reputation, and long-term access to supply.

References

Japanese tourism policy, market data, and regulation

Japan Tourism Agency (JTA), Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism
Travel Agency Act and licensing framework
https://www.mlit.go.jp/kankocho/en/

Japan Tourism Agency
Overview of Travel Agency Registration Categories and Requirements
https://www.mlit.go.jp/kankocho/shisaku/ryokogyo.html

Japan National Tourism Organization (JNTO)
Inbound Tourism Statistics and Policy Targets
https://www.jnto.go.jp/statistics/eng/

Japan National Tourism Organization
Visitor Spending Trends and Market Breakdown
https://www.jnto.go.jp/statistics/eng/visitor_spending.html

Corporate structure, company law, and establishment

Japan External Trade Organization (JETRO)
Setting Up Business in Japan: Legal Structures (KK, GK, Branches)
https://www.jetro.go.jp/en/invest/setting_up/

JETRO
Incorporation Procedures, Capitalisation, and Practical Considerations
https://www.jetro.go.jp/en/invest/setting_up/section2/

Taxation and consumption tax (Japan VAT)

National Tax Agency of Japan
Overview of Japanese Corporate Tax System
https://www.nta.go.jp/english/taxes/corporation/index.htm

National Tax Agency of Japan
Consumption Tax Overview and Scope of Taxable Transactions
https://www.nta.go.jp/english/taxes/consumption_tax/index.htm

National Tax Agency of Japan
Consumption Tax Treatment of International Transactions
https://www.nta.go.jp/english/taxes/consumption_tax/01.htm

Deloitte Japan
Japan Tax Guide 2024–2025
https://www2.deloitte.com/jp/en/pages/tax/articles/japan-tax-guide.html

Permanent establishment and cross-border risk

OECD
Model Tax Convention on Income and on Capital
https://www.oecd.org/tax/treaties/model-tax-convention-on-income-and-on-capital-condensed-version.htm

PwC Japan
Permanent Establishment Risks for Foreign Businesses in Japan
https://www.pwc.com/jp/en/tax/publications/permanent-establishment.html

Payments, banking, and financial infrastructure

Bank of Japan
Payment and Settlement Systems in Japan
https://www.boj.or.jp/en/paym/index.htm

Financial Services Agency of Japan
Regulation of Payment Services and Stored Value Instruments
https://www.fsa.go.jp/en/

JETRO
Opening Corporate Bank Accounts in Japan: Practical Barriers
https://www.jetro.go.jp/en/invest/setting_up/section4/page2.html

Employment and labour law

Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW)
Overview of Japanese Labour Standards and Employment Contracts
https://www.mhlw.go.jp/english/policy/employ-labour/labour-standards/

MHLW
Social Insurance Systems and Employer Contributions
https://www.mhlw.go.jp/english/policy/employ-labour/social-security/

Additional articles you may find of interest

Antravia Asia Homepage

VAT Reclaim in Japan

Profit from Asia in 2025: A guide for Travel Agents

Disclaimer:
Content published by Antravia is provided for informational purposes only and reflects research, industry analysis, and our professional perspective. It does not constitute legal, tax, or accounting advice. Regulations vary by jurisdiction, and individual circumstances differ. Readers should seek advice from a qualified professional before making decisions that could affect their business.
See also our Disclaimer page